Catch up on the latest GSA board meeting recaps anytime—on the road, on your tractor, or at home.
The board approved canceling November and December meetings due to holidays and scheduled a special meeting for December 15th at 8:00 AM. The Landowner Assessment Committee received guidance on using the Proposition 26 process for implementing assessments through a protest-based election system. Technical assistance applications are being processed and coordinated with the agency's technical advisor, showing active landowner engagement in groundwater sustainability projects.
The water authority faces a critical infrastructure crisis with subsidence damage threatening to eliminate water delivery capacity by 2043, requiring $4 billion statewide to repair the State Water Project. The agency is advocating for $150 million annually from California's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to address these massive repair costs. Despite the infrastructure challenges, current water supply remains stable with approximately 39,000 acre-feet available for delivery and storage...
The Board approved a major milestone for the Friant-Kern Canal Pump-Back Project, formally adopting environmental documentation and authorizing implementation to restore water delivery capabilities affected by subsidence. Water operations achieved nearly double the previous year's volume through the Cross Valley Canal, totaling approximately 34,000 acre-feet with extensive quality monitoring. The ongoing federal government shutdown is significantly impacting water infrastructure projects...
The board approved a new 3-year incentivized fallowing program paying landowners $730 per acre annually to take irrigated land out of production, with applications opening November 1st. A priority action area was rescinded after discovering measurement errors that incorrectly triggered groundwater level violations. The agency has collected $2.3 million in groundwater fee deposits with true-up invoices expected in February.
The groundwater sustainability agency discussed positive developments regarding State Board oversight, with a staff report expected in January that could return the subbasin to state water department authority. The board must decide on organizational structure once a new subbasin-wide joint powers authority is formed, choosing between expanding current arrangements, maintaining separate cost-sharing agreements, or creating a standing committee. Immediate decisions are needed regarding...
