Committee voted to recommend mandatory well registration for ag/industrial wells (generally >2 AFY) and directed staff to clarify language (domestic/retired wells intended as optional; info to best ability). Oct. 31, 2026 was discussed as a target deadline; noncompliance discussion included zeroing Tier 1/Tier 2. Updated fallowed field and dedicated recharge basin policies were recommended to the board.
Four GSAs are in early feasibility discussions with SWP/CVP contractors (Southern California agencies being a key example) on a groundwater banking concept to bring new wet-year supplies into the region, with a negotiated leave-behind volume benefiting local growers and SGMA compliance. No decisions were made; multiple stakeholder input opportunities ahead. Return water to partners would primarily use west-side surface water; groundwater recovery is a backstop.
Groundwater storage declined in 2025, with some monitoring wells and subsidence points moving closer to thresholds — and with surface water allocations projected low, groundwater will again carry the primary burden. Well registration outreach continues as the subbasin moves toward a mandatory process. An overdraft management framework is being developed and is expected for board discussion at the May 12 meeting.
Well registration is moving toward mandatory enforcement, with two public workshops scheduled April 6 and April 21 before any formal board action. The fallow field policy amendment was discussed for rework after unresolved questions about cover crop water use and the definition of fallow. A multi-agency water banking feasibility report is expected in April, with a potential special board meeting.
Well registration is moving toward a mandatory program, with the committee favoring an option that could zero out allocations for non-compliant growers and asking staff to draft policy and hold stakeholder workshops; staff will begin rolling out a fast‑track registration process to reduce grower burden as notices go out with upcoming invoices.
