Catch up on the latest GSA board meeting recaps anytime—at home, on the road, or on your tractor.
Proud Partners of
Groundwater levels in the Arroyo Seco subbasin remain near sustainability targets following recent wet years; General Manager Weeks said demand management is not needed right now. A five-year Groundwater Sustainability Plan update is expected to be released for a 90-day public review in early September, with a public hearing planned for mid-January. Coastal seawater intrusion continues to pose a major unresolved challenge.
The board discussed plans to mail personalized water accounting statements and hold workshops for demand management outreach, noting the staffing transition is within the current budget. A member also flagged new subsidence reports across the Sacramento Valley. The board authorized counsel to finalize a county staffing MOU so a County Management Analyst can serve as CGA administrator, with the intent to transition away from the current third-party contractor over time.
The board approved the Prop 218 Engineer's Report and Prop 26 Cost of Service Study and set Sept. 29, 2026 hearings; Prop 218 ballots will be mailed to affected owners as part of the process. Staff said the neighboring Tule Subbasin interim plan includes discussion of a proposed pumping moratorium, adding urgency to finish the GSP by March 2027 as the state seeks six weeks between meetings. The maximum rates are $26.84 per assessable acre and $19.24 per acre-foot.
Short-term demand forecasts were highly accurate (met 8 of 9 best practices); auditors recommended stronger documentation. Chair Member raised rising bills and affordability; staff said price elasticity will be considered in the next rate cycle. JPA audits noted San Francisquito Creek backlog and San Luis & Delta-Mendota deficiencies; committee discussed a board oversight framework and handbook review.
A $50/acre-foot groundwater extraction fee was approved for FY 2026-27 after a majority-protest hearing, along with a penalty policy providing a 12-month cure period before up to $500/acre-foot penalties. A draft recharge policy was discussed but not adopted; commenters raised concerns about leave-behind percentages and technical support.
