1. Cost table prompts requests for clearer sub-basin context Staff circulated proposed Table 10.3 separately from the released draft groundwater sustainability plan (GSP) amendments. Members discussed a roughly $1.4 billion agency-wide cost figure; the table lists SGMA implementation and preferred-portfolio costs separately. Members and public commenters worried that an agency-wide figure in individual sub-basin plans could look like a Forebay or Upper Valley charge. Staff discussed clarifying the table label and explanation, possibly with a footnote. Preferred-portfolio costs have not been allocated to individual sub-basins.
Already have an account? Sign In
